Tuesday , July 16 2019
Home / africa / Import & # 39; important & # 39; Nuclear SA in the mix of electricity, says Parly Commission

Import & # 39; important & # 39; Nuclear SA in the mix of electricity, says Parly Commission



The energy portfolio committee has strengthened its strong support for South African nuclear power mixing.

It is a sharp contrast to the latest government plan for the future electricity mix of South Africa: the 2018 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) project, which does not cost nuclear energy.

According to a report issued by the Department of Energy on Wednesday, the energy portfolio committee IRP "explicitly states that coal and nuclear are important elements of energy mix in South Africa."

The IRP project, based on the "minimal cost" of South Africa's future electricity mix, excluded the expensive nuclear power, at least until 2030.

However, the energy commission reports: "There is no persuasive argument, nuclear technology is the lowest technology, the safest and, in the long run, it remains the cheapest technology."

Nuclear & # 39; is not competitive & # 39;

Harald Winkler, director of the UCT Energy Research Center, asked South Africa's reliable modeling and said in South Africa that the IRP project excluded nuclear power and new coal plants from the "at least cost" electric plan.

"Nuclear is not competitive and it's not coal," Winkler said.

The Energy Department of the IRP project offers renewable energies and gas for a minimal mix of electricity for new plants.

The Commission compiled its report on the IRP project after making public hearings.

The UCT Energy Research Center was publicly published and considered as a research base.

Parliamentary committee process was outside the Department of Energy, which allowed citizens to submit written comments on the IRP project on October 26.

IRP is expected to start next year.

Criticism

The Commission's report has criticized lobby groups to collect information and channel coal and nuclear.

Liz McDaid, SA Faith Community Environment Institute (Safcei) stated that the commission provided a report by an international energy policy expert on the high cost of nuclear power. He said that the commission was in no way proving at least the nuclear cost.

"DoE will review the committee's report on its substance, not the will of politicians, nor the nuclear-powered ones. Here's a chance to act in public interest, but they failed," McDaid said.

Nuclear agreements with Russia and other countries, which were approved by the Parliament, were found to be illegal in the Western Supreme Court of 2017 and abandoned.

Richard Halsey presented his 90×2030 project, and the report stated that the nuclear "absurd" was the cheapest in the long term.

"It is an opinion, not a representative of public audiences, so that when parliamentarians approached the issue, there were coal and nuclear biases that were under way," said Halsey.

CSIR, as part of its portfolio commission, said MPs, as well as the CSR and Energy Department's modeling, make renewable energy sources cheaper electricity with gas.

CSIR, like DoE, has said that neither nuclear nor coal is "cost-optimal" solutions.

The Director-General of the Wind Energy Association, Brenda Martin, said the report does not say that the renewable energy sector is "four times more employment-intensive" than coal or nuclear sector.

The IRP project includes 1,000 MW of renewable energy production, within the framework of the Independent Power Producers (IPP) government-built government sector.

"Support" lobby team

Robyn Hugo, a lawyer at the Center for Environmental Rights, excluding the introduction of new coal-fired power plants in the IRP project, said the opposition was based on analyzes of the merits evaluations of the charcoal factory.

"However, the commission points out that lobby groups' views, including coal-fired coal-fired coal-incinerators, and claims on their job creation credentials, have been recognized by the candidate's groups to support the necessary and costly plants to access the IRP -R23bn and more- costs, "said Hugo.

However, the report has received support among its recommendations that the IRP should be established in this event to promote political certainty; The IRP should be reviewed every two years; The Plan for the Integrated Energy Plan and the Gas Utilization Plan must be accelerated; IRP continues to develop local industries and continues to be flexible in responding to new technologies that are changing rapidly in a rapidly changing energy environment; and the local government enters the IRP planning process and allocates 200MW of solar energy-encapsulated creation to at least 500MW.

Many of those who were sent to the Commission in their presentations said that it was necessary to ensure the transition to fossil fuels and renewable energies that was "a fair transition" in the coal industry and coal mining. In this way, coal workers would be in training to use renewable energy.

The Commission recommends in its report that DoE should be the "National Transient Transient Approach", which should be directed at communities that are affected by coal movement.

Also, the Energy Minister, Jeff Radebe, calls on Energy Power to discuss the energy future in South Africa.

* Register Fin24's main news in your inbox: INTRODUCTION FIN24 TO THE NEWSPAPER

Follow Fin24 on Twitter and Facebook. 24.com encourages comments sent through MyNews24. Contributions of 200 or more will be taken into account for publications.


Source link