Wednesday , September 28 2022

After the inclusive language, animals: ask for different popular expressions – 12/12/2018



[ad_1]

Until recently, they used meat consumption, natural skins and physical abuse. Now, perhaps, in accordance with the wave of the inclusive language, it was a small thing: posters of environmental associations, such as the People of Ethical Treatment for Animals (PETA), were on the way to using the language. of "Do not stop using anti-animal language".

For example, popular statements question "kill two birds with a stone"Edo"bull take the bulls"-This information is spread according to social networks-, without counting on other Spanish writers without a lively meaning, but somehow in English Some animal species are "violated" or "humiliated". For example, the phrase "bring home bacon"(" Homemade bacon "), a classic" stop the pot "comparable to the general plane.

However, Castilian also has some other typical features, even under a magnifying glass with a transitory nature, because of the animals, because they are negative connotations. For example, "Each pig gets their San Martin"Edo"The dog died, the rage is over".

It is interesting that PETA proposes in his campaign Alternative sentences could hold the meaning of the original, but a statement, in the eyes of the NGO, was acceptable.

In fact,kill two birds with a stone"Suggest"Feed two birds with a scon"…

… and classic "t"horns of the bull"Offer"Treats thorns".

Santiago Kalinowski, Director of the Department of Linguistic and Linguistic Research of the Latin American Academy, "When the group says that the minority is offensive to some expression, we must take this statement very seriously".

The phenomenon is very complex, but it is very common in language use. "That happens Proverb animals are lexicalized, meaning the crystallization of meaning. Therefore, the enunciation of these sentences is not really about a bird or a bull, "Kalinowski explained:" The problem is that the word exists, that is, even if the meaning has crystallized, the animal does not disappear. "

Why deal with these concerns, whose extremes are extreme? According to the expert, "we saw this many times … for example, for example & # 39;I worked like a black man& # 39;, a phrase that was not heard, but it was a lot used Initially, only a few were used".

"Use & # 39;black & # 39;, in this case, it was lexicalized, but at some point it was understood that it was offensive, because people brought with them a strange strained work, outside of intellectual work, rather than to other ethnic groups, "said Kalinowski.

In that regard, as published in Twitter, PETA said "the words are important and, according to our social justice, our language evolves with the same." And in this understanding, the anti-species postulation – the concept of animal species less than men is clear.

Kalinowski concluded that "changing the language does not change reality, that is, if sexual statements are not used automatically sexism will not be. However, although reality creates a language, in reality, we configure discourses, that is, we use the language. And we have the right to create discourses that can affect others and reality. Do not underestimate it ".

[ad_2]
Source link