Revision of scientific studies published in the journal British Medical Journal Check again the use of sweeteners: they say There is no convincing evidence to protect the beneficial uses of sugar cane, and this – if not enough – can not be excluded as a result of consumed.
The English newspaper The Guardian reported that Cochrane has made a non-profit, international research group. To this end, he wants to provide specific evidence about the World Health Organization (WHO). they're doing "Unsweetened Sweetening" or NSS Guide, the concept of artificial sweeteners like aspartame, as well as natural alternatives that are not very low in calories such as stevia.
Over the last few years, more and more concerns about health and quality of life have encouraged more healthy lifestyles to avoid sugar, salt or fat. In this way, sugar and sweetened unsweetened instead of ordinary sugars became more and more popular.
Although accepting the use of many sugar sweeteners, their benefits and harm are known in daily acceptable intake, because, due to evidence "often limited and conflicting"Responsible for the study.
Balance, suspension momentum in all diet.
To better understand this, a group of European researchers (Hungary, Germany and France) analyzed 56 studies that have not been compared or compared to non-lactating sugars, compared to large adult consumption and healthy boys.
Expert weight measurement, blood sugar control, oral health, cancer prevalence, cardiovascular and kidney disease, mood and behavior in general. Studies were evaluated in evidence for rounding and certainty.
In general, the results showed in most cases It does not appear to be statistically or clinically significant inequality Unlike alcoholic sweeteners and alcoholic beverages, or between different doses of sugar sweeteners.
For example, the results of adult small studies showed slight improvements in body indices and the rapid levels of blood glucose produced from sugar-sweetening drinks, but The certainty of this evidence was small. Smaller intakes of sugar sweeteners were slightly lower (-0.09 kg), but the certainty of this new evidence was low.
The sweetener consumption has increased over the last decade.
In boys, a lower increase in the body mass index was compared to sugar-sweetener compared to sugar consumption, but sugar-sweetener was unrelated to weight.
They did not have any effect on sugary sugar, overweight or obese adults or children who are trying to lose weight.
Clarín consulted, as the nutrition politician and economic center, Sergio Brittos (CEPEA) explained, "there is evidence in the scientific literature poor efficiency to increase the amount of beverages and sweetener foods as a means of reducing sugars and weight gain. In some studies, the effect is still regressive to achieve a greater weight among those who consume chronically artificially sweetener products. "
Britos states that "if the diet is to reduce sugar intake, the most effective long-term interventions will be reduced delicious flavors exhibition, artificial sweeteners; Especially in the first years that indicate the moment of the enduring habits ".
Source: Europa Press and bugle