Scientist Chinese He Jiankui On Monday he said that in vitro fertilization was the genes that changed the hybrid virus-resistant twins, the announcement made his university suspension and ethical criticism "dangerous" and "negligent" action.
He trained Stanford-based researcher in the United States and a specialized Shenzhen Genome laboratory, using this technique CRISPR-Cas9, called "genetic assurances", allows the elimination and replacement of unwanted parts of the genome when a defect is directed to a computer.
The children, called "Lula" and "Nana", were created as part of an embryonic in vitro fertilization in the mother's womb.
Genetically Modified DNA It can be used to prevent illnesses, but this practice is a serious problem, because new generations will cause genetic changes.
du Southern Science and Technology University (SUST) Shenzhen University announced it has ceased He was Jiankui and if his experiment is contrary to ethical and academic regulations, he will investigate Review MIT Technology.
The University reported that he received his salary in February and did not consider the transformation of genetic infusions to "violate the ethics of academics and its ethical criteria".
The prediction of this medical experiment was made on the eve of the beginning of the Hong Kong World Genome Speech Conference, the Chinese researcher must present the results in detail.
However, after the critics received, the genetic conference is not guaranteed.
The self-proclaimed medical experiment was not independently verified. The Chinese team has not published its results in the scientific journal.
Experiment "very problematic"
After the announcement, many Chinese scientists and organizations criticized this experiment. One hundred Chinese colleagues criticized their experiences, published a questionnaire and changed the laws of in vitro fertilization.
In addition, international researchers criticized the announcement that it was a YouTube video
"These results predict videos on YouTube are very practical scientific problems," said Nicholas Evans, a professor of philosophy at Lowell University in Massachusetts, in the United States, working on bioethical issues.
"This goes away from the control processes that continue to be a lot of scientific advances, such as peer evaluation," he added. AFP.
Whether it's reported, the issue creates "serious ethical concerns," says Sarah Chan Edinburgh University, Mentioned by the Science Media Center.
"Talking about these claims seems to be most fraudulent (…) deliberately fraudulent," he added.
He did not answer any questions AFP.