Monday , November 29 2021

With a close vote, the ruling party won half a penalty for the wealth tax in the Deputies



[ad_1]

The bill for the Extraordinary Solidarity Contribution would reach just over 9,200 people who have declared assets of more than 200 million pesos (Adrián Escandar)
The bill for the Extraordinary Solidarity Contribution would reach more than 9,200 people who have declared assets of more than 200 million pesos (Adrián Escandar)

After a day of marathon, the ruling party got the necessary votes and gave half a penalty to the Solidarity Contribution bill only once or, as is well known, the wealth tax..

Returning to the House of Representatives after the isolation of COVID-19 as a result of possible contamination, the Speaker of the lower house, Sergio Massa, He mentioned that some feel it is painful to have to put in extra effort on tax issues but understand that they require a single and last effort to lay the foundations for Argentina and noted in a previous vote. that he was “very optimistic” that the ruling party would get the necessary votes on the side “even with the help of the Deputies for Change of Change.”

Massa’s sentence did not go unnoticed, because the ruling party knew that it had the right votes to give half a penalty to the project. The Frente de Todos has 119 deputies and needed 10 more votes in favor. The Lavagnismo and Socialism blocs stated that they would be accompanied, but not all legislators in these blocs would do so.

At the time of the final count, it can be seen that the ruling party lost two votes this time: that of a regular ally like Alma Sapag, of the Neuquén People’s Movement, who gave a harsh speech (he said it would bring “more political and social costs”). ) and the General Front of Santiago de Cuba, Bernardo Herrera, hospitalized with coronavirus.

The number of votes also reflected previous agreements, such as with Juan Schiaretti, the governor of the Federal Republic of Córdoba, and the radical Gerardo Morales, who voted in the 2021 budget. With these aids, 133 votes in favor, 115 against and 2 abstentions appeared in the last vote.

Street militancy supported the tax
Street militancy supported the tax

To show unity, I support the party in government behind closed doors and I do not recommend rumors about the incidents with the Minister with the Economy Martin Guzman it passed Congress before the vote. Minister of Social Development, Image of Daniel Arroyo’s placeholder and productive development, Matias KulfasIn addition to the leaders of La Cámpora, Fernanda Raverta (Anses) and Luana Volnovich (PAMI).

With these numbers, the government, along with lawmakers, held talks on benches, screens and on the street from the start of the session at around noon with militancy approaching the National Congress friendships.

Photo of the Union, Albertism, Massism, La Cámpora in Congress in favor of the wealth tax
Photo of the Union, Albertism, Massism, La Cámpora in Congress in favor of the wealth tax

In Juntos por el Cambio, the view was that they would always lose the vote, and then within the bloc of the civil coalition, the UCR and the Pro, they expressed their strategy on two main axes. The first indicated that the rules were intended Maximum Kirchner and written Carlos Heller It is not a single or supportive contribution, it is a tax, confiscating and not very federal, because it is not shared. The second is to emphasize that even if accepted in both chambers, the relationship between rich and poor will not change and will harm productive SMEs.

This was stated by the president of the Juntos por el Cambio interblock, Mario Negri, at the time of closing. “We have not come to declare war, but to discuss whether it is feasible, if that is the way and the direction.”began the radical leader. In this regard, he blamed the executive branch for the economic situation in the middle of the pandemic: “The quarantine was to maintain and rearrange the health system, not to become a government program; this has had a major impact on the already vulnerable economy.”

“We are among the top ten in terms of declining GDP, fiscal deficit, unemployment and inequality. We want to tell you that it’s not effective, even if it’s a nice, epic name. “Negri continued. “We are the ones who have taxed the private sector the most in the region, if we don’t create wealth there will be no investment, where will the currency come from,” he asked to conclude the criticism.

He was in charge of the final closure Maximum Kirchner he spoke from his home when he had to leave the premises after 11pm when he was informed that he was in a close relationship with a person from COVID-19. Referrals from the ruling party spoke out against the Change Together, saying the wealth tax was discussed “not only because of the pandemic” but also because of the country we receive it from. In this regard, he expressed his deepening of the economic crisis following last year’s primary elections and stated that Mauricio Macri which he identified as a “political leader of the opposition”. “After the outrage of August 12, the reserves began to drain quickly. From the Central Bank, reaching $ 43 billion by October 25; Argentina lost $ 20 billion because the president decided to take shares after losing the general. He knew that if he put it ahead – as he should – the election result would be much worse. To collect two million more votes, he sacrificed 20 billion from the Central Bank, ”Kirchner noted.

The project

The bill for the Extraordinary Solidarity Contribution would reach just over 9,200 people who have declared assets of more than 200 million pesos. It establishes that its central axis is a temporary contribution that will only reach human beings with a high level of heritage wealth. Only those with a declared wealth of more than 200 million pesos are included, with an aliquot of 2%, which increases as assets increase.

(Adrián Escandar)
(Adrián Escandar)

Half of the 9,200 people that would be obtained through this contribution have designated a fortune of between 200 million and 400 million pesetas. In this sense, the highest tax rate, according to data provided by Afip, reaches less than 300 people.

If the indicated goods are abroad, the aliquots are 50% higher.

One point much criticized by the opposition that is, the project taxes working capital, inventory, machinery, and its shareholders.

The project has determined specific revenues, according to official estimates, to be about $ 300 billion:

I kept reading:

One by one, the Government sent the Deputies the keys to the legal abortion bill

The government defended the mobility formula for retirements: “Our hope is to overcome inflation, not link it”



[ad_2]
Source link