Thursday , August 22 2019
Home / australia / Technological platforms, anti-vaxero (opinion)

Technological platforms, anti-vaxero (opinion)



An incessant and increasingly stringent debate on technology issues by technology companies focuses on a new dimension for urgent public health and international emergency health issues.

In this case, what we need to ask is: Technology companies have the responsibility to moderate their content when there is a risk of public risk?

This month, some high-tech companies have implicitly and implicitly responded. All the companies that have asked us should answer this affirmation and will analyze these misinformation in two possible ways in the platforms.

The Guardian released the worst case of vaccinations around the vaccine to find out how to classify and spread anti-vaxer content. The Guardian found that the neutral search for the word "vaccine" had no friends or anti-vaccine scientific content on Facebook, and YouTube without permission. Both companies' algorithms will target the anti-vax pages and videos, even when consumers consume consumed authoritative medical devices at first, similar to a video loaded by the Mayo Clinic on the MMR vaccine.
After deploying early media announcements from the Guardian, Facebook, YouTube, owned by Google, and other platforms responded to the dossier to completely disregard the content (Pinterest) for vaccines to take no-action measures. (YouTube) treading the water problem while being analyzed (Facebook). Adam Schiff, the Democratic Democratic Californian, sent Facebook and Google companies a concern for companies' vaccine against "recycling and recommending". Amazon, when faced with CNN, mentioned the prevalence of vaccine content to the reporter's content guidelines page, which means that customers provide a "variety of perspectives" but "keeps the right to sell content," such as pornography and other content inadequate. "The latest vaccine in Amazonia came about as a result of vaccines against vaccination.
Recently part of what the media, technology companies and politicians have reacted to Washington has been the fastest emergence of various preventative illnesses. After an increase of 30% of cases of redundancy, the World Health Organization adopted a "Health Vaccine" program in 2019 in the list of World Health Issues. Washington is one of several states, with parents, with a personal or philosophical objection, to have their children vaccinated. Similar vaccines have occurred in other neighboring countries, because they link autistic vaccines to the center of control and prevention of illnesses and a strong medical authority.
High-technology companies have a history of lack of responsibility for online information impact, as well as the laws of free expressions. It is clear that it is worrying that some slippery slope moderation of dangerous substances is much more moderate or that they have been harshly criticized, to forbid the content that is considered. But even in recent years, it has begun to spread contentious content, including terrorist propaganda and child pornography. There are two high-tech companies that can use them, in other areas already in the process of responding to public health crises.
Rubella gave me an inability. This is my message for anti-vanbrers
It is about the participation of Terrorism Technology, the United Nations and technology companies cooperation project. As it was launched in 2017, it is a great effort for both large technology companies and small businesses to share good practices and share information shared with the efforts made to eliminate the content of the terrorist ideas. In the case of public health, the international effort of the World Health Organization may be similar to practice companies using nonsense nonsensical information from online platforms.
The second option is to moderate its own content and generate clear mechanisms to find users not able to alert themselves to issues. Facebook and other companies have already used the extreme version of this method to find and remove terrorist propaganda from their sites. The use of AI and human beings is impossible to find messages that support terrorism and, on average, 18 hours in advance.

Similar to the program, but smaller, poor health information would not necessarily have to exclude content; That is why the companies that use terrorist content and the loss of children put their practice into practice, even though they are scary. Central AI would be similar to the use of human and human surgery practices, but it will label the suspicious scientific content, in the same way labeled malware. When users look for information on vaccines and suspect sites, they will see a warning label.

The intelligence agencies worked hard to persuade large tech companies, especially Facebook and YouTube, that the content of its website was an essential part of contracting ISIS and other terrorist groups and that companies responded in a timely manner. In this case, scientific information is a public health crisis, especially in children. Tech companies have the responsibility to respond. The only question is how.


Source link