Sunday , December 15 2019
Home / canada / Note: Justin Trudeau continues to threaten Andrew Scheer to sue the Canadian political tradition – National

Note: Justin Trudeau continues to threaten Andrew Scheer to sue the Canadian political tradition – National



Justin Trudeau's defamatory behavior as Prime Minister Andrew Scheer is a fast-paced list of out-of-play international outcasts against the Conservatives against SNC-Lavalin, who is simply a conflict dispute.

Scheer, who had already revised some rhetoric at the beginning of the debate, told Trudeau that he had "unlawful pressure" against general Jody Wilson-Raybould's attorney to punish charges of bribery and corruption in Quebec.

At the end of March, the frightful criticism of the critical leader became more accurately and more clearly responsible for crime, a worse work in the political arena.

READ MORE: Scheer challenges Trudeau to repeat comments that cause threats to harm

Scheer's Declaration – It was expanded through Twitter and Facebook, beyond the strong legal protections provided by Parliament's privileges – he said Trudeau's actions were "corruption corruption.""

Trudeau's lawyer's letter emphasized the claim of "corruption" against the prime minister, who painted "the worst political behavior, corruption, worthy of criminal penalties up to 14 years before." . "

Following the Playbook

When this book was served, Trudeau continued the book of modern political leaders in Canada. Actually, the three prime ministers of the country had three attorneys, their main political opponents over the rhetorical line between powerful debate and allegedly outcasts.

In March 1998, Jean-Chrétien's Prime Minister threatened to repeat Preston Manning and other parliamentary reform courts – a newly appointed accusation outside the Commons House. The senator Ross Fitzpatrick was a beneficiary of the "seat sale" of the Senate, after Chrétien's economically profitable year-end from Fitzpatrick's head. Manning moderated attacks and the lawsuit against threats never took place.

In November 2005, lawmakers of the liberal leaders of Paul Martin warned Stephen Harper of a book, then opposition leaders (under the auspices of Parliament), Martin has accused party parties of all the provinces of Quebece. organized crime support ".

Stephen Martin (left) was threatened by minister Paul Martin (right) in 2005. A few months later the threatened party was forgotten and Harper was elected Prime Minister. CANADIAN PRESS / Tom Hanson

Laws were violated and the authors were imprisoned in the scandal sponsor of the post-1995 referendum, but there was no evidence of organized crime.

Below at the bottom: Justin Trudeau accuses Scheer of "deceiving" & # 39; The Canadian defends the lawsuit.





Forgotten threats

In media statements, and Harper asks us to ask for a lawyer's letter, the liberals warned the conservative leader "fake the same" prohibition as if it were outside the Commons, faced with a defamatory behavior. However, a few months later he was asked to apologize and the threatened party was threatened, the Prime Minister was chosen by Harper.

The conservatives denounced Martin's lawsuit as a threat and criticized the gag for the criticisms, although in March 2008 Harper made his first move, after being accused by Prime Minister Stéphane Dion of a "conservative bribery" attempt in 2005. To manipulate independent MP Chuck Cadman, when the cancer was killed, the House of Commons voted.

There was no such thing as Harper's personality with Cadman. According to him, he said that this suit was necessary for the protection of his honor: "I have the right, as a family, to defend our reputation".

READ MORE: Scheer deletes Trudeau's tweeting threats on libel lawsuits

Harper's outfit was awakened

Dion, Harper, threatened a defamation threatening to "opponents" of his liberal opponents in silence. Fizzled in the case and was released without charges in 2009.

Trudeau – Like Martin and Harper in 2005, as in 2008, the federal election was only a matter of months away, when its main opponent was threatened with sentencing.

It is not surprising that critics inadvertently release the elections to the government to decide on the detriment of adverse charges. But it is not surprising that, even when opposition rhetoric is legally dangerous, all parties take up elections.

The accusations of defamation have become almost commonplace in Canadian politics in recent years.

Scottish Prime Minister Kathleen Wynne, for example, Tim Hudak and Patrick Brown have been fighting against the inflammatory attacks of the following provinces, "respectively" ("evidence") and "trial" in a suspected case of bribery (in fact, he was summoned to court by the court).

Extracted apology

Hudak clubs were settled or retired in 2015; Morocco seems to have fallen out of clothes. In September of 2017, Wynne brought immediate immediate remorse to conservative parliamentary Bill Walker, who was due to bribery as a result of the inquiry, saying he was for bribery.

Former Conservative chief of Ontario, Patrick Brown, asked Kathleen Wynne's vice president, but the case did not reach the court. Brown later sued the former judge by a colleague.
CANADIAN PRESS / Peter Power

Brown, at the same time, his allies – Ontario Finance Minister, Vic Fedeli, recently sued. In front of the new Brown book, Fedeljak accused the Tories of Ontario and the sharp behavior of 2018, to be President Doug Ford (and Brown to Brampton's mayor).

Byron Sheldrick, a political scientist from Guelph University, argued last year Maclean on The rise in the rage that was politically motivated in the article could lead to an upheaval of Canadian political debate. Political lawsuits that will cause a tough criticism of defensive damage The SLAPP trial has called for strategic defamation claims by SLAPP, but it seems to have caused real damage to a plot that has been damaged by true reputation.

READ MORE: Vic Fedeli, with Patrick Brown, about the 8 million dollar "defamation" report

It is not a new idea

If the idea gets traction, the rising tendencies of political defamation claims would eventually be reduced. It is not possible to finish the old phenomenon just as Canadian policy.

In 1878, during the years of opposition to Sir John A. Macdonald, people came out of the ordinary people out of the ordinary. Prime Minister Alexander Mackenzie has described this scene in a note written by George Brown's liberal title. Globe In the newspapers and decades, Macdonald's arch Nemesis – printed a condemnation of Sir John A.

Sir John A. Macdonald, Canada's first prime minister, threatened several issues in 1878 that his opponents had been drinking at the House of Commons. THE CANADIAN PRESS / Adrian Wyld

"Sir John Macdonald said that on Friday night he was somewhat inadequate for the liquor's exposure," he said. Globe she says "Simply the word was drunk in ordinary common sense."

The accusation was republished in the liberal press, and there was a continuation of Macdonald's numerous threats of controversy, none of which was done accordingly; Perhaps this truth is an absolute defense against a libel act.

However, Macdonald regained the prime minister in 1878 and, sometimes, he was drunk and defamation until his death in 1891.Conversation

Randy Boswell, Senior Lecturer, Journalism and Communication School, Carleton University

This article is under review under The Creative Commons License. Read the original article.


Source link