Wednesday , October 20 2021

Why Sara Wheale PM's youth committee resigned over comments on her construction staff



[ad_1]

EDMONTON – Sara Wheale Justin Trudeau is one of those people who spoke in Argentina. When arriving in rural areas, people with "social impact" work in construction areas.

"Gender Impacts are Moving Construction Workers to a Rural Area," said Trudeauk at the G20 panel. "If they are social effects, because most are men's construction workers, how do you adjust and adapt to them? This is the GBA-plus budget genre lens.

The comments of the Prime Minister began controversy in February at the Alberta oil industry, and on Tuesday Tuesday, announced by Wheale on Facebook, he decided to refuse to leave his youth council.

Wheale, 23, is a heavy equipment operator and carrier. In addition, it is a suburb of Brazeau County, in the southwest of Edmonton. In 2017, he was appointed to the council of young people to advise Trudeau and his government to face the Castilian youth.

His resignation to Trudeau, on December 5, 2005, stated that it is one of the youngest women in the oil industry.

"What will tell you, they are not bad, because I should call them as soon as possible," he wrote. "They are my friends and family, many of them do not associate with me, but when you spend more time with people you work with your family, you become your family."

He talked to Wheale National Post on Wednesday, why he left.

Why did you give up resignation?

I am one of these construction workers in these rural communities. That's my entire community. That's our world. We believe that we are one of the communities that work in our infrastructures projects, like pipes and highways. So it was a question, how will I deal with it? And what can I buy? What decision can I live with, ultimately? And I decided that. I spoke to some letters before sending the letter, and this was the best way I was able to express my opinion and support and help with my community.

Was it the last straw?

Yes, there have been many things, and I am happy with the dialogue with the Prime Minister and other ministries of the cabinet. But that was the only thing, where I am. I sit down at the table to defend and provide first-class experiences, I would like to show those who do not understand it as something else in that country. And I thought, you know, I was doing a good job, and then it happened and I was very well. I was a little rejoiced. I thought it was not appropriate and there was a lot of knowledge left; He did not touch the real experiences of the people. I was really disappointed.

Do you think that collar politicians do not understand a lot of Canadians?

It would be nice if the white collar world were ready to understand a bit more. Although I would like to have time to understand, have a bit of a walk in our shoes, sit down and have a real conversation.

Did you return to Trudeau?

I have not heard from the Prime Minister directly.

Why did you decide your letters publicly?

I was thinking of a lot of people as I was thinking.

For me it was totally rude and disrespectful to say publicly (when I presented it). The Prime Minister wanted to be able to revise the letters, and if he wanted to make comments, if he did not choose it, he did not choose it. But there is a certain degree of respect, and for me it was necessary to respect the prime minister and his schedule and all that. The opportunity, I really told anyone before.

I did not intend to be like today. He found out less or less. It's a public council, publicly named, so I do not think it's public.

How has your family reacted?

They help me very well. My father has been in the oilfield construction company for 30 years. He is an Oilfield consultant, so my decision is very supportive and I understand why I did it and I'm happy that I made that decision.

The interview has been edited and condensed for clarity and length.

• E-mail: [email protected] | Twitter:

[ad_2]
Source link