South China Morning Post
Retired Canadian police refuse to testify at Meng Wanzhou’s extradition hearing
A retired Canadian police officer refuses to testify to Huawei Technologies executive Meng Wanzhou at an extradition hearing in Vancouver, amid claims by Meng’s lawyers that Canadian authorities were involved in a covert exercise in gathering evidence against him to enforce American law. Ben Chang, a former sergeant of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) staff, has retained the outside lawyer and advised him not to appear at hearings resumed in the British Supreme Court on Monday, Richard Peck Meng’s chief adviser Heather Holmes told the Justice Association. .The denial was a “matter of concern,” Peck said. Get the latest instructions and analysis from our Global Impact newsletter about great stories created in China. Chang was involved in an email interview with Sherri Onks, a Vancouver lawmaker. The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation on December 1, 2018, the day Meng was arrested, according to Meng’s attorneys. He was not called by “a Chinese minister” after Meng’s arrest, Meng’s lawyers say. Also on Monday, the court learned that Meng could still be a permanent resident of Canada, despite trying to renounce that status 18 years ago. the waivers were surplus and had no legal force, according to an email read in court by a Canadian border agency. The Meng legal group has tried to show that the examination by Meng border agents had no justification; If Meng had been identified as a permanent resident, it may have had an impact on whether or not this study should have been conducted. Meng’s lawyers have depicted various interactions between RCMP officers and the FBI to prove that he intended to collect the treatment that Meng had treated on the day he was arrested at Vancouver airport. Evidence of U.S. prosecution. Meng, Huawei’s chief financial officer and the daughter of founder Ren Zhengfei, has been accused by US authorities of defrauding HSBC by lying about Huawei’s dealings in Iran, punishing the Middle East country with the risk of a bank breach. Menge denies the allegations. Border agents called police to give Mengen’s passwords a “heartfelt” error. Exchange said in an affidavit that he “believed” that the FBI had asked him to “identify information about the electronic devices seized from Ms. Meng.” But he also said in an affidavit “[as] They never asked me for identification information [any] A member of the FBI, or any other member of any other U.S. authority, never shared that information. “Meng’s lawyers called it” denial of the boiler. ” The Canadian Border Services Agency (CBSA) searched and interrogated Meng and seized his electronic devices within three hours of his arrest by the RCMP, which he said should be “immediately” arrested, according to his lawyers. Meng was accused of abusing Canada’s provincial rights, and should be expelled as a result of the US trial for extradition to New York. and conducted the disputed boundary analysis and intercepted his electronic devices and passwords C One of the BSA officials. CBSA official Scott Kirkland told the court he had issued a notice with Mengen passwords for an error to the RCMP, a violation of Canada’s privacy law. He said the mistake was “embarrassing” and “heartbreaking.” Since Menge arrived in Canada almost two years ago, he has angered Beijing, sending China’s relations with Canada and the US into a downward spiral. , Beijing arrested Canadians Michael Spavor and Michael Kovrig on charges of espionage. In Canada, their situation is considered retaliation, and the arrest is considered hostage. Meng is under house arrest in Vancouver, where he lives in one of the two homes in the city. His extradition proceedings are expected to last until next year, but appeals could take much longer to process. Also on Monday, a Canadian border officer arrived at a hearing against another Meng lawyer, Mona Duckett, when witness testimony began again. Huawei’s Meng has secured a small victory with the aim of canceling US extradition. CBSA superintendent Bryce McRae testified last month that Meng arrived at Vancouver airport and was arrested before the day he was on his way to Canada. On Monday, McRae described the attempts on December 1, 2018 to find out if Meng was still a permanent resident of Canada, which he achieved in 2001, but wanted to resign the following year. Duckett cited CBSA activity records for the day in which the superintendent said the airport “could not determine the status of the subject” and was seeking Ottawa’s help in doing so. McRae admitted that he was the superintendent and that the subject was Meng. Duckett referred to an internal CBSA email dated December 5, 2018 that Menge still believed was a permanent resident. Meng’s efforts to grant that status were not legal and so “the customer is PR,” Duckett said, McRae as a correspondent who did not read the email. The “voluntary termination process” – conducted by Meng from June 28, 2002 to November of that year – occurred under redundant rules and therefore had “no legal effect” on Meng’s situation, McRaek said in a statement from the same email. A Canadian border official has dealt a blow to Meng Wanzhou’s claim to the hidden plot. CBSA Superintendent Sanjit Dhillon, one of the officers questioned by Meng, was at the next stand. Crown attorney Diba Majzub, who represents U.S. interests in the case, said he was concerned that day. Meng suggested that there was an arrest warrant that may have been unacceptable to Canada for criminal reasons. This criminal concern, while not “definitive,” was the basis for examining Meng’s border, Dhillon said. the study, he read about Meng and Huawei on Wikipedia, including “espionage and security issues.” When Meng wanted to know why he was prolonging his study, Dhillon “interspersed” questions about Huawei. “I asked him what he did for work … just to be comfortable,” he said. Huawei then asked him where he sold his products to investigate the espionage problem. Finally, Meng said “security issues” have prevented Huawei products from being sold in the U.S. He said his attitude had been “closed”. Dhillon denied that anyone had asked Meng to ask these questions. In a previous affidavit, Dhillon said Meng was also asked if Huawei was selling Iran products. The hearing was postponed until Tuesday. in the afternoon. In a statement Monday afternoon, Huawei Canada said last month’s hearings “revealed important information about the details of Meng Wanzhou’s arrest and the motivation behind it.” “Huawei continues to have great confidence in Ms. Meng’s innocence and the integrity of Canada’s judicial system. The truth is coming out,” he said. More from the South China Morning Post: * Huawei Meng Wanzhou executive extradition to resume in Canada * Canadian border official says Meng Wanzhou’s device password is “embarrassing and heartbreaking” for police. Canadian court investigates YouTube video for China over Donald Trump’s “trial” of “dirty work” by Donald Trump has weakened claims on the plot This article refuses Canadian police to refuse to testify in Meng Wanzhou’s extradition hearing first appeared on the South China Morning Post. Download the latest news from the South China Morning Post on our mobile app. Copyright 2020.