Friday , July 1 2022

Vision: Vegans are really extreme?


Selene NelsonImage copyright
Selene Nelson / Instagram

White presentation space

Selene Nelson published several articles on the template by writing articles about the editor William Sitwell, proposing a series of vegans killing and refusing to denounce the subsequent storm. Here, Nelson said what was happening in the middle of the storm, and how he felt with Sitwell's The One Show.

It started slowly. "Selene Nelson is a nasty bitch," he read the first tweet "It's a disease worthwhile." Next, in a few minutes, it was even worse: "This self-righteous and violent privacy will never appear in any other way". "Lonely miserable (here was the four word envelope) in his life is not a substance." In a few days, the abuse was a bit cumbersome, as did mass media requests – Good Morning Britain, LBC, Daily Mail and many foreign publications from New Zealand and Australia to the US.

While they cringe through carnival gifs, they thought they could hear the thoughts and the suspicions of cinema media. I had real lungs around bitrioles. Bemused, still not surprised, we all know what Twitter is – and vegan, well know how annoyed my life can make people. After a while, the abuse became a confusion, so I changed my phone as an airplane, I disconnected my social communications notifications, refused to comment requests and I worked with the work.

What was the middle of the social media storm? I have sent William Sitwell, Editor of Waitrose Food magazine, after I've organized a series of vegetable cooking. Sitwell's response suggested a series "to kill vegans, one by one. Catching the ways? How to properly ask, will they explain hypocrisy?" Since he said it means that the email was "maid", but that was not read.

Find more

Media playback is not supported on your device

Multimedia noticeWaitrose's "vegans killing vegan" editor known

Selene Nelson appeared with William Sitwell (on the left) and BBC's Justin Rowlatt One Show, On BBC One, Monday, November 26

Click here to access iPlayer

Behind the sharp character of the message I see many people who hear the word "vegan" – hostility, defense, anger. As a vegan, I'm expecting some people, but from an editor that was not working at Waitrose, the company that opened its new vegan range. The "unanswered" response to the editors is not in any way answered, and I understand why a highly respected and successful editor in power situations would undermine the independent way of working. .

The next day, after I stayed there, I studied BuzzFeed, why just refer to veganism to protect the hostility of others. BuzzFeed wanted to know about Sitwell's email news. On Monday and Wednesday, Sitwelle fell.

The story was distributed by the media and citizens. Many people sent me support and solidarity messages, others were criticized for finding the message fun. There were, too, those who condemned the emotional "betrayal" to me: I found a concept to be understood, I did not consider William Sitwell.

Undoubtedly, the idea of ​​freedom was the subject of this debate, although it was not related to the story: Sitwell exercised his right to freedom, but to exercise that right, he said free speech.

This weekend, Sitwell talked to The Mail on Sunday about what he has done when he broke the story from abuse. The graphic threat of violence with her, as well as her wives and babies, are unknown. But the idea of ​​"vegan without blood," which is comedic, I received the same level of abuse as Sitwell and also excludes threats. Raging omnivores, it seems, are raging vegans over the game.

Image caption

William Sitwelle told One Show about the threats he had with him and his family

However, we should look at ourselves with a broader reference. Good Morning was a segment called Britain, "Vegans hating is a new rule?". "Stand up to vegan terrorists!", While The Daily Mail handed out its readers while writing about "vegaphobia". Excepting "normal" reasons, people hate vegans (supposedly annoying, divine, and hypocritical), the storyteller proposed a deeper reason; People see veganism as a "threat to identity, values ​​and beliefs". The author wrote, partly because it deepens the belief in human superiority over human beings.

It's likely to shorten the word like "Vegaphobia" if you enter the snowflake vegan troop. Vegans are very sensitive and militant. Vegans have not stepped on the minority, and being more discouraged is absurd. But as we see, we are talking about the oppressors' majority: animals, millions, right now, are dying and dying.

I think there is another reason under the hostility of veganism: confessing animal suffering. Fake vegan is easier than listening, because it allows you to not pay for animal pain: do not you even face it? Everything we like about the media, vegans are not vegans or looking for shame – but we want people to know about the truth about animal farmers. If someone is aware of animal suffering and if animal products continue to be happy, the decision is informed. But right now, most people who consume meat, dairy products and eggs are not every day.

It is a decision-maker, but the main thing that I have learned from experience is that many people do not know what veganism really is. They understand vegetarianism, but veganism is "too far". It's "extreme". Veganism is not a diet, or something like it, or people around you. It is a profound philosophical belief, a way of life, as practical and as possible, to avoid the cruelty and exploitation of all living things. There is no such end.

This week I met William Sitwell for the first time. They contacted me at The One Show, William talked to me and talked together about our experiences. They felt the idea a little bit, but there were other feelings: curiosity, challenge, hope. Can it undoubtedly be a good thing to discuss individual experiences? And, by the way, we could have a more controversial (polite) veganism, better.

In regards to different people in different opinions, William has not found anything. I was very happy about its warmth and good will, and how I liked the dishes with my favorite flavors: "Pork socks stuffed with chicken!" – He wanted to hear Most vegans have said since "I can not argue with a moral perspective on achieving their lifestyle choices" – I respect and admire a comment (and, of course, agree).

But as I have proved, it was not for me about William Sitwell, or why I resigned it or why I sent it for the first time. Why was it acceptable or fun to treat vegans with hostility and anger. I'm sorry that William Sitwell has lost his job, but I do not regret it by email. A conversation about veganism and how we perceive the way we perceive it, and this is a must-have conversation.

I'm glad, William is pleased to be part of this discussion too. In the Times, he said that he can work together to "explain the food world and describe people to our people". I also hope that, and I believe, it sends a powerful message: two people of different opinions, above all, may be united by two people considered as enemies of the media, to talk mentally and to analyze this problem without causing abuse, get it everywhere. We have made progress as a species.

Join conversation – enable Facebook, Instagram, YouTube and Twitter.

Source link